Re: PGCon brand

From: Melanie <melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To:
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGCon brand
Date: 2009-01-11 15:23:08
Message-ID: 496A0EDC.4000705@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

does that mean we can register commandprompt.nc and you wouldn't have a
problem with it? Seems like a lack of imagination to me. If you try to
do microsoft.us, I can promise you that you'd find your butt in court
real fast.

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 23:21 -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>
>
>> As the owner of pgcon.us, you obviously have a different view in terms
>> of what is and is not a brand, it is clearly within your interests to
>> take that viewpoint.
>>
>
> That is certainly true but pgcon.us came about *after* the others. I
> would also note that I don't actively use that domain except where
> logistically necessary. I believe you were already sent an email
> directly to that effect.
>
>
>> For others not aware: I am the founder of PGCon.
>>
>>
>
> I don't think anyone is disputing that you originated PGCon.org.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-01-11 17:15:16 Re: pgday.org : how to federate the PgDays ?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-01-11 14:03:36 Re: pgday.org : how to federate the PgDays ?