| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: debuging postgres |
| Date: | 2004-08-24 16:42:22 |
| Message-ID: | 4919.1093365742@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>> ./configure --enable-debug
> Is this enough? I'm seeing that with --enable-debug only the
> option -g is passed to the compiler and the option -O2 is
> still there, is it not better compile with -O0 if you are
> going to debug it?
If you want to single-step through the code a lot, then -O0 is good.
But are you really gonna do that so much? I do most of my tracing
at the level of function calls.
I tend to use -O1 as a compromise setting --- the code isn't totally
scrambled but it doesn't run like a dog either. (Also, for development
purposes, -O0 is evil because it disables certain useful warnings in
gcc.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-24 17:20:34 | Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900 |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-08-24 16:16:24 | Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900 |