| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: minimal update |
| Date: | 2008-10-29 19:31:09 |
| Message-ID: | 4908B9FD.3040905@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 06:05:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Minimal" really fails to convey the point here IMHO. How about
>>>>> something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"?
>>>>>
>>> I think it means something to us, but "no op" is a very technical phrase
>>> that probably doesn't travel very well.
>>>
>> Agreed --- I was hoping someone could improve on that part. The only
>> other words I could come up with were "empty" and "useless", neither of
>> which seem quite le mot juste ...
>>
>> regards, tom lane
>>
>>
> redundant?
>
>
>
I think I like this best of all the suggestions -
suppress_redundant_updates_trigger() is what I have now.
If there's no further discussion, I'll go ahead and commit this in a day
or two.
cheers
andrew
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| min-update-2.patch | text/x-patch | 15.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-10-29 19:32:18 | Re: autovacuum: I need some explanation |
| Previous Message | Noah Freire | 2008-10-29 19:26:18 | Re: autovacuum: I need some explanation |