Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]

From: Melanie <melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]
Date: 2008-10-28 15:10:03
Message-ID: 49072B4B.80507@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Thanks JD - I didn't realize that and so since the list I was aware of
having signed up for was the .us one, I assumed it was the same. thanks
for the clarification! :-)

Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Melanie wrote:
>>
>>> Since the .us list is now slowed down by being a moderated list, I want to
>>> confirm before friday that the deletion of my(and whomever else's) email
>>> address and then it being readded, did not ALSO result in my vote being
>>> deleted. I just assume I don't need to vote again and want to confirm.
>>>
>> Melanie,
>>
>> pgus-general is not a moderated list. The members@ list is. The members@
>> list is meant to be an announce list which is why it is moderated.
>>
>
> Josh,
>
> Melanie was talking about the postgresql.us mailing list - which she
> indicated above.
>
> Perhaps you meant to name that list members-announce(at)postgresql(dot)us?
>
> The impression you gave me by simply calling it 'members' is that this
> is a list designed to bring people together, which doesn't work very
> well when we can't talk to each other.
>
> -selena
>
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-10-28 15:17:03 Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]
Previous Message Selena Deckelmann 2008-10-28 14:59:18 Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval]