Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: parallel pg_restore - WIP patch
Date: 2008-09-29 23:38:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Um, FKs could conflict with each other too, so that by itself isn't
>>>> gonna fix anything.
>>> Good point. Looks like we'll need to make a list of "can't run in 
>>> parallel with" items as well as strict dependencies.
>> Yeah, I was just thinking about that.  The current archive format
>> doesn't really carry enough information for this.  I think there
>> are two basic solutions we could adopt:
>> * Extend the archive format to provide some indication that "restoring
>> this object requires exclusive access to these dependencies".
>> * Hardwire knowledge into pg_restore that certain types of objects
>> require exclusive access to their dependencies.
>> The former seems more flexible, as well as more in tune with the basic
>> design assumption that pg_restore shouldn't have a lot of knowledge
>> about individual archive object types.  But it would mean that you
>> couldn't use parallel restore with any pre-8.4 dumps.  In the long run
>> that's no big deal, but in the short run it's annoying.
> hmm not sure how much of a problem that really is - we usually 
> recommend to use the pg_dump version of the target database anyway.

We don't really need a huge amount of hardwiring as it turns out. Here 
is a version of the patch that tries to do what's needed in this area.



Attachment: parallel_restore_4.patch
Description: text/x-patch (38.9 KB)

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-09-30 00:21:29
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2008-09-29 23:24:20
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group