Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL future ideas

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: "'PGSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
Date: 2008-09-25 08:54:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Gevik Babakhani napsal(a):
> Dear PG hackers,
> Has there been any idea to port PG to a more modern programming language
> like C++? Of course there are some minor obstacles like a new OO design,
> this being a gigantic task to perform and rewriting almost everything etc...
> I am very interested to hear your opinion.

Firebird did it 5 years ago. They of course use only small part of C++ 
and they could do that because they takeover source code and they 
started to clean a code.

Advantage of C++ is that it reduce lot of OO code written in C in 
postgresql, but it is so big effort to do that without small gain. It 
will increase number of bugs. Do not forget also that C++ compiler is 
not so common (so good) on different platforms. If somebody interesting 
in that yes but like a fork ( PostgreSQL++ :-).

Better idea is to start to use C99 in postgreSQL ;-).


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sITDate: 2008-09-25 09:14:13
Subject: Re: Transaction Snapshots and Hot Standby
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2008-09-25 08:23:01
Subject: Re: Add default_val to pg_settings

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Gevik BabakhaniDate: 2008-09-25 09:50:00
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL future ideas
Previous:From: Tommy GildsethDate: 2008-09-25 08:47:45
Subject: Re: Minor bug/inconveniance with restore from backup, using PITR base backup and archived wal files

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group