Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: match an IP address

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: match an IP address
Date: 2008-09-23 13:06:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
Craig Ringer wrote:
> Phoenix Kiula wrote:
>> 1. What extra tax will this constraint levy on an INSERT or UPDATE on
>> this table? There are about 100,000 inserts a day, and over three
>> times as many UPDATES. The concurrency is pretty high -- I mean
>> sometimes 1,000 users at the same time but no more than that. If the
>> additional cost of insertion/updating is not too heavy, I suppose this
>> could be a nice approach.
> I'd try a functional index first. If that didn't do the job, I'd use a
> trigger-maintained column _purely_ as an optimisation (ie I could drop
> it and lose no data) that stored text representations of the data.
> Honestly, though, I expect the functional index would be more than good
> enough and probably wouldn't have much of an INSERT/UPDATE cost.
> Again, of course, I'd test before setting anything in stone.

And do not forget you know beforehand if you are going to lookup a user
or an IP. So I fail to see what problem needs to be solved here :(

Maybe we can get an enlightenment on where every data comes from and
whats going to be its usage? Maybe we can then work out a better
solution at all? Peephole optimizing is great but sometimes the effect
is better if you just open the door :-)


In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Steve AtkinsDate: 2008-09-23 15:37:53
Subject: Re: match an IP address
Previous:From: Craig RingerDate: 2008-09-23 12:42:47
Subject: Re: match an IP address

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group