| From: | Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: OT: Question about transactions |
| Date: | 2008-08-12 21:24:08 |
| Message-ID: | 48A1FF78.6020002@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 04:09:48PM -0400, Paul Tomblin wrote:
>> they go to process the second message? Could they do a "BEGIN
>> TRANSACTION" at the start and "END TRANSACTION" when they're done
>> processing, even though the processing only does queries and not
>> updates?
>
> Try SERIALIZABLE mode. If I understand you correctly, it will do what
> you need.
That seems like it might work. Thanks.
--
Paul Tomblin <ptomblin(at)xcski(dot)com> http://blog.xcski.com/
Conspiracies abound: If everyone's against you, the reason can't
_possibly_ be that you're a fuckhead.
-- The Usenet Guide to Power Posting
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oliver Jowett | 2008-08-12 23:37:01 | Re: PreparedStatement timeouts? |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2008-08-12 20:54:10 | Re: OT: Question about transactions |