Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Should/does SQLForeignKeys work (8.03.02)?

From: Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Should/does SQLForeignKeys work (8.03.02)?
Date: 2008-08-09 00:41:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Tom Lane wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> Seems the server side implementation of foreign keys was changed in 8.3
>>   and 8.3.02 ODBC drivers didn't know it.
>> I beleive the bug was fixed in 8.3.0201.
> So ... when will that be released?

I would talk with Hiroshi Saito about the next release.
Anyway I have not been able to commit changes to psqlodbc
for some days because the server responds with the message
 "waiting for anonymous's lock in /cvsroot/psqlodbc/psqlodbc".

Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Joost KraaijeveldDate: 2008-08-10 17:11:14
Subject: c type of int8 / serial8?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-08-08 23:59:19
Subject: Re: Should/does SQLForeignKeys work (8.03.02)?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group