| From: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dirk Riehle <dirk(at)riehle(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact |
| Date: | 2008-06-01 05:23:21 |
| Message-ID: | 48423249.4090406@Sheeky.Biz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Dirk Riehle wrote:
> <h3>Won't EnterpriseDB loose sales once replication is added to the core
> PostgreSQL product?</h3>
>
> <h3>Won't a reduced differentiation between EnterpriseDB and the core
> product reduce their addressable market?</h3>
>
To these two I would mention that although the developers are planning
to add basic replication with a goal of easy config, this won't take out
the need for a more complex replication options that EDB offers
--
Shane Ambler
pgSQL (at) Sheeky (dot) Biz
Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dirk Riehle | 2008-06-01 13:31:44 | Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-06-01 03:22:23 | Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Vysokovskih | 2008-06-01 05:35:53 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-06-01 03:22:23 | Re: Feedback on blog post about Replication Feature decision and its impact |