| From: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Map forks (WIP) |
| Date: | 2008-05-07 07:11:16 |
| Message-ID: | 48215614.4080307@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I'm not completely satisfied with the way this looks, so I'll try a
> slightly different approach next: Instead of having one SMgrRelation per
> fork, add an extra ForkNumber argument to all the smgr functions.
Here's an updated patch using the above approach. Looks much better now,
IMO. The FSM implementation is still an incomplete mess, so don't bother
looking into freespace.c or indexfsm.c, but I'm quite happy with the
forks stuff now.
I shall work on the FSM internals next...
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fsm-forks-3.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 55.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-05-07 07:23:22 | Re: plpgsql CASE statement - last version |
| Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2008-05-07 06:41:34 | Re: [badalex@gmail.com: Re: [BUGS] Problem identifying constraints which should not be inherited] |