Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Date: 2008-05-01 02:11:34
Message-ID: 481926D6.6030209@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,

> So it would be much better to have this functionality be "mainstream"
> rather than a fork. If it does get bounced, please do it becuase of code
> quality and not because "nobody is asking for this".

+1

Joshua D. Drake

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2008-05-01 02:16:31 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-05-01 01:01:58 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrej Ricnik-Bay 2008-05-01 02:16:31 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2008-05-01 01:01:58 Re: [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches