Re: Protection from SQL injection

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Thomas Mueller <thomas(dot)tom(dot)mueller(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Protection from SQL injection
Date: 2008-04-29 14:35:41
Message-ID: 4817323D.8070700@wildenhain.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

> In C the best practice is to use #define for constants. In C++ you
> have 'const', in Java 'static final'. Unfortunately the 'named
> constant' concept doesn't exist in SQL. I think that's a mistake. I
> suggest to support CREATE CONSTANT ... VALUE ... and DROP CONSTANT
> ..., example: CREATE CONSTANT STATE_ACTIVE VALUE 'active'.

of course you mean:

CREATE CONSTANT state_active TEXT VALUE 'active'; ? ;)

interesting idea, would that mean PG complaints on queries

SELECT state_active FROM sometable ... because
state_active is already defined as constant?

What about local session variables? Usefull as well...

I think this is really a big effort :-)

Greets
Tino

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-04-29 14:58:17 Re: Protection from SQL injection
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-04-29 14:22:34 Re: SRF in SFRM_ValuePerCall mode