| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | postgre(at)seznam(dot)cz |
| Cc: | Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] postgreSQL multithreading |
| Date: | 2008-03-30 17:25:36 |
| Message-ID: | 47EFCD10.6080303@postnewspapers.com.au |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
postgre(at)seznam(dot)cz wrote:
>
> What about some C dynamically loaded function in which I could call new connection for each thread?
>
Past discussion here suggests that the backends are strictly single
threaded. While you might be able to use multiple threads - I don't know
- I expect you'd need to protect all SPI access by a lock that
serialized everything anyway.
Doing it externally with a script / program that uses multiple
connections might just be the way. Unfortunately that means that you
don't get a single consistent snapshot - each connection will have its
own, potentially different, view of the database state.
A possible use for read only transactions being able to share a snapshot
came up in discussion a few weeks ago. I guess this is another one.
--
Craig Ringer
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A. Kretschmer | 2008-03-30 17:29:22 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] postgreSQL multithreading |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2008-03-30 17:17:10 | Re: Survey: renaming/removing script binaries (createdb, createuser...) |