Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Added ECPGget_PGconn() function to ecpglib, courtesy of Mike

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Added ECPGget_PGconn() function to ecpglib, courtesy of Mike
Date: 2008-03-25 21:34:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committers

Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:30:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's not the extra function that I object to so much as the library
>> version number bump.  That's going to create problems for packagers.
> Ah, I didn't think far enough. Sorry, your definitely right on this one.
> Reverted.

But is it OK to add a function to the library without bumping the 
version? AFAICS all you have reverted is the version bump, so we could 
have two versions of the library with the same version number, one with 
the new function and one without - that seems somewhat undesirable.

Also, regardless of the safety or otherwise, isn't it our standard 
practice not to change anything in stable releases except for bug fixes? 
That's part of what makes Postgres so stable, in fact.



In response to


pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-25 22:42:46
Subject: pgsql: Simplify and standardize conversions between TEXT datums and
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-25 20:18:18
Subject: pgsql: Done: > * -Avoid tuple some tuple copying in sort routines

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group