| From: | Colin Wetherbee <cww(at)denterprises(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Space wasted by denormalized data |
| Date: | 2008-02-28 22:12:17 |
| Message-ID: | 47C731C1.8080008@denterprises.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Decibel! wrote:
> I wrote this query to identify how much space is being wasted in a
> database by denormalized data. For each field in each table, it
> calculates how much space the field is taking in it's table as well
> as indexes, then it calculates how much space would be needed if that
> field was normalized into a separate table. It places some (somewhat
> arbitrary) minimums on how much space would have to be saved to
> include that field in the output. If you want to get rid of the limit
> you should still keep savings > 0 in the query, otherwise you'll
> start seeing normalization suggestions that make no sense (like
> normalizing an int).
That's... really cool.
What does this mean? :)
pg_size_pretty
----------------
(1 row)
Colin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dan Armbrust | 2008-02-28 23:13:56 | errors in pg_restore on windows? |
| Previous Message | Decibel! | 2008-02-28 21:57:17 | Space wasted by denormalized data |