Cédric Villemain schrieb:
> We don't exactly now all the things we want to write. But ...
> * we need to be able to translate webpage
> * 'interactive' wiki does not seems to be mandatory
> * full static pages are just pain to change when needed ( do pgweb
> team member confirm me ? )
> Thus, twiki or dokuwiki are *very* simple to install/maintain. They
> are like static (no DB, only flat files).
> About mediawiki, it can be very good (I like the job Greg did), it is
> tsearch2 propulsed !
> Drupal is already deployed in postgresql.org infra, and I think Selena
> just make it like a standart to pugs ? Drupal got also some modules
> for i18n.
> Let's vote :
> * dokuwiki
> * twiki
> * mediawiki
> * drupal
> * static webpages
> * others ?
this is the wrong thread to discuss this. We made the discussion already
in another thread. Dave suggested drupal already and nobody brought
forward arguments against this.
We are just waiting for the designer at the moment.
In response to
pgeu-general by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-02-28 11:32:06|
|Subject: Re: HOW to push to internet|
|Previous:||From: Jean-Paul Argudo||Date: 2008-02-28 10:48:27|
|Subject: Re: Announcing PostgreSQL Europe / Spain PUG|