| From: | Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX |
| Date: | 2008-02-19 21:58:19 |
| Message-ID: | 47BB50FB.4060608@langille.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Erik Jones wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> We're using PostgreSQL 8.1.11 on AIX 5.3 and we've been doing some
>> playing around
>> with various settings. So far, we've (I say we, but it's another guy
>> doing the work) found
>> that open_datasync seems better than fsync. By how much, we have not
>> yet determined,
>> but initial observations are promising.
>
> Here's a good explanation (by the Greg Smith) on the different sync
> methods. It basically says that if you have open_datasync available,
> it'll probably beat everything else.
Where is that explanation?
--
Dan Langille
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference : http://www.bsdcan.org/
PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference: http://www.pgcon.org/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erik Jones | 2008-02-19 22:09:41 | Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX |
| Previous Message | Erik Jones | 2008-02-19 21:32:02 | Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore? |