Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX

From: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
To: Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX
Date: 2008-02-19 21:58:19
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Erik Jones wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>> We're using PostgreSQL 8.1.11 on AIX 5.3 and we've been doing some 
>> playing around
>> with various settings.  So far, we've (I say we, but it's another guy 
>> doing the work) found
>> that open_datasync seems better than fsync.  By how much, we have not 
>> yet determined,
>> but initial observations are promising.
> Here's a good explanation (by the Greg Smith) on the different sync 
> methods.  It basically says that if you have open_datasync available, 
> it'll probably beat everything else.

Where is that explanation?

Dan Langille

BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference :
PGCon  - The PostgreSQL Conference:

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Erik JonesDate: 2008-02-19 22:09:41
Subject: Re: wal_sync_methods for AIX
Previous:From: Erik JonesDate: 2008-02-19 21:32:02
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group