Robert Treat wrote:
> Just so you know, I approached OReally about writing a PostgreSQL Cookbook,
> and they turned it down. They did offer me some other titles, but those don't
> seem to have gone anywhere.
As someone else pointed out in this thread, very much of what you need
to know has been previously discussed at one point; the hard part is
What we need is for some of the people with the big brains ;) to come up
with some new kind of "hyperbook". That would be the documentation in
some form similar to what it is today, but somehow connected to the
discussions that happen in the mailing lists. That way, when something
really insightful or helpful gets said in the mailing lists, it can get
connected to a particular place in the documentation. Then over time,
the doc maintainers can take the best of those and incorporate them
directly into the docs at the appropriate place.
This would not only benefit those looking for information, but also
those hearty and knowledgeable souls (like Tom) who patiently provide it
repeatedly as the same questions pop up every couple weeks/months.
Plus, the documentation would grow and become much more useful over
time. Then, instead of repeating answers to repeating questions, we can
just point to the appropriate place in the docs. The "unattached"
discussions could identify sections lacking in the docs; i.e., if enough
unattached discussions accumulate for a particular topic, then that
probably indicates the need for a new section in the docs on that topic.
To be honest, I think a hyperbook would be easier to implement with
forums than with mailing lists. The former are permanently resident in
a known place, while the latter are out there in the ether (or in some
unorganized archive that is notoriously hard to link to.)
In response to
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: fschmidt||Date: 2008-01-31 21:41:41|
|Subject: PL/Tcl implementation|
|Previous:||From: Andrej Ricnik-Bay||Date: 2008-01-31 21:04:53|
|Subject: Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?|