Re: Bug? 8.0 does not use partial index

--On torsdag, januari 13, 2005 17.03.41 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:

> Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net> writes:
>> How do you mean they look far off?
>
>> Seq Scan on group_data (cost=0.00..47544.43 rows=114164 width=43)
>> (actual time=114.015..1334.479 rows=4 loops=1)
>
> 114164 estimated vs 4 actual rows is pretty far off. Perhaps something
> skewed about the data distribution?

Well, it might seem strange, but it is a quite normal data distribution for
this application, believe me.

>> If you want, I can send you the data.
>
> If it's not too huge, sure, send it to me off-list.

I'm doing that now.

/Palle