| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] Egad, what a lot of spammage |
| Date: | 2008-01-16 15:10:49 |
| Message-ID: | 478E1E79.5080106@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:33:31AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> - --On Tuesday, January 15, 2008 21:43:23 -0800 "Joshua D. Drake"
>> <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> I wonder if it would be possible to restrict the gateway so that if
>>> the only way it gets through is if the post "only" posts to pgsql.
>>> groups.
>> I'll get that setup tonight ... I disabled usenet->mail last night
>> (mail->usenet still active) when Tom paged me ...
>
> Do we have any statistics of how many *legitimate* posts actually come
> thruogh that way? That aren't spam of any kind?
Even if we do it would be easy enough to say.. Hey if you are posting to
rec.arts.wannabe.a.bondage.queen and pgsql.general, that the post is
likely offtopic.
If it is really a concern we could open the filter up to allow pgsql.
and any comp.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> //Magnus
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-01-16 15:47:32 | Re: [CORE] Egad, what a lot of spammage |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-01-16 15:08:21 | Re: [CORE] Egad, what a lot of spammage |