Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fair large change to contributors

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fair large change to contributors
Date: 2007-12-05 07:23:58
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>> Bad choice of words. But if your patch is applied, I can't see a diff
>>>> of your changes. And it's still logged as one ad and one remove. so I
>>>> can't easily diff between tomorrows version and one two steps back.
>>>> And since there really is no gain, imnsho, I see no reason to take
>>>> away that ability.
>>> O.k. I just checked and if I use svn mv instead of svn rm and svn add,
>>> then the changelog will follow. That should remove your concern yes?
>> Magnus' concern is svn diff, which does not really work.  (I've been
>> annoyed by this).
> correct. And I repeat that I see no actual gain countering this annoyance... If there was enough on the plus side, I'd be happy to live with it...

Consistency is more important than general annoyance but I am trying to 
find a happy medium here. What if I leave the old file in place but 
empty with a comment of why? Thus the svn diff etc... stays intact.

Considering we are now talking about contributors not developer bios 
that should be sufficient.

I will admit that I didn't change the underlying tables. I wanted to but 
didn't because I am unaware of what else may call to them.

Joshua D. Drake

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-12-05 08:59:18
Subject: Re: Fair large change to contributors
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-12-05 07:21:53
Subject: Re: Fair large change to contributors

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group