| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, NikhilS <nikkhils(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
| Date: | 2007-11-29 16:49:11 |
| Message-ID: | 474EED87.2030408@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Rules are extremely slow in comparisons and not anywhere near as
>>>> flexible. As I said up post yesterday... they work well in the basic
>>>> partitioning configuration but anything else they are extremely deficient.
>>> I think that the above claim is exceedingly narrow-minded.
>> We are talking about partitioning. It is supposed to be narrow-minded.
>
> Sure, but look at all the confusion we have had just on this list about
> it. We had better state why triggers should be used in place of rules
> _for_ _partitioning_ or that confusion will continue.
Sure I have no problem with that.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-11-29 17:08:29 | Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-29 16:42:18 | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-11-29 17:08:29 | Re: [DOCS] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-29 16:42:18 | Re: [PATCHES] Partition: use triggers instead of rules |