Re: thread by Jessica Richards on read only permissions

From: Mija Lee <mija(at)scharp(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: thread by Jessica Richards on read only permissions
Date: 2007-10-27 00:09:32
Message-ID: 472281BC.6020108@scharp.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Actually I didn't. I thought I had tried doing that as my testuser and
wasn't able to, but I must not have.

Okay, so nix that idea, because why assign security if it isn't secure.
Which brings me back to the question of if there is a way to do this
without listing every table in every schema. There must be...

Thanks Tom!

Mija

Tom Lane wrote:
> Mija Lee <mija(at)scharp(dot)org> writes:
>> I wanted to follow up on the thread opened by Jessica Richards on
>> granting read only permissions. Basically it sounded like there were two
>> options:
>
>> 1. granting select on each table
>> 2. alter user set default_transaction_read_only to true
>
> You do realize that #2 is completely insecure? It's only establishing a
> session default, which the user can override with a simple SET.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliveiros Cristina 2007-10-29 15:36:51 Graphical tools for PostGres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-10-26 20:10:58 Re: thread by Jessica Richards on read only permissions