Re: [HACKERS] PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Mija Lee <mija(at)scharp(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Date: 2007-10-01 17:13:41
Message-ID: 47012AC5.9040808@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

Tom,

> Maybe we need to actively discourage people from running Postgres
> against NFS-mounted data directories. Shane Kerr's paper cited above
> mentions some other rather scary properties, including O_EXCL file
> creation not really working properly.

Wouldn't you be describing a Linux-specific issue, though? And possibly
kernel-specific?

It's hard to reconcile this with the real-world performance of
PostgreSQL on NFS, which is happening all over the place. Most notably,
Joe Conway's 20,000 txn/sec.

I *do* think it's an accurate statement that if you're going to use
Postgres, or any other OLTP database, on NFS you'd better have access to
a NAS expert. But to say that it's a bad idea even if you have expert
help is probably going to far.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-01 17:24:41 Re: [HACKERS] PG on NFS may be just a bad idea
Previous Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-09-29 14:23:59 Re: PG on NFS may be just a bad idea

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-10-01 17:15:08 Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-10-01 17:06:58 Re: Enforcing database encoding and locale match

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Wright, George 2007-10-01 17:19:47 DST question
Previous Message Nis Jørgensen 2007-10-01 10:19:05 Re: Why is my view ddl being altered by postgres?