Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?
Date: 2007-09-05 22:47:13
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Kris Jurka wrote:

> This is the consensus I'd like to see built before we spend a lot of 
> time on something.  Heikki doesn't believe we should do this at all as 
> it is covered by DBCP and app server pools.  You clearly believe we need 
> this and I'm sort of on the fence (I recall that's where Oliver is as 
> well, but I don't claim to speak for him).

I think it belongs outside the driver, but I could be convinced 
otherwise if Dave etc. presents a good technical argument as to why it 
is easier to implement within the driver. Haven't seen that yet.


In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Till ToengesDate: 2007-09-05 23:02:20
Subject: Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?
Previous:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2007-09-05 22:45:27
Subject: Re: Caching driver on pgFoundry?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group