| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: enum types and binary queries |
| Date: | 2007-08-30 21:44:16 |
| Message-ID: | 46D73A30.9000108@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> What if we just defined the binary format as being identical to the text
> format, ie, the enum label? A bit silly but at least it would eliminate
> the gotcha that binary I/O fails.
>
>
>
So we should pretty much mimic text_send/text_recv? If so I can probably
get that done fairly quickly.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-30 22:30:07 | Password requirement in windows installer |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-08-30 21:34:42 | synchronous_commit: Developer's View |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-08-30 22:16:49 | Re: HOT patch - version 14 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-08-30 20:08:41 | Re: HOT patch - version 14 |