Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Albert Cervera i Areny <albert(at)nan-tic(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Date: 2007-08-29 22:52:47
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers

Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
>> I'm very strongly in favor of having this documentation.  However, I think
>> it might make sense to put "Contrib Modules" as a section under either
>> "Reference" or "Appendices".  Also, I don't think it's necessary to make
>> each command option a separate subchapter, but I can see how that would be
>> hard to avoid in an automated system.
> It's not an automated system, README files have different structures so it's 
> all manual work. That's why I asked how you think it should be organized. 
> Anyone else thinks we should put it in Reference or Appendixes?

I would far rather have a new top level heading. Something like 
"Standard Modules and Tools". (Please avoid the use of the word 
"contrib"). If not, than as a sub-chapter of "References". I don't think 
it belongs in the Appendixes.



In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2007-08-30 09:31:58
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Previous:From: Albert Cervera i ArenyDate: 2007-08-29 22:37:31
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-08-29 23:05:26
Subject: Re: reindexdb hangs
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-08-29 22:45:57
Subject: Re: text search function renaming

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group