| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Version differences |
| Date: | 2007-08-10 14:18:52 |
| Message-ID: | 46BC73CC.2080002@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>>>> Personally, I believe we should only talk about the "latest" release on
>>>>> the front page and have "older releases" linked.
>>>> Disagree - we should be linking to the latest point releases of each
>>>> supported branch. Many people just can't do a major upgrade every year.
>>> Well sure, we are one of them ;). I am not saying hide the older
>>> releases but you don't see stuff about RHEL 3 (which is still supported)
>>> on redhat's front page.
>> No, but then you pay a lot of money for their auto-upgrade service to
>> tell you that updates are available for RHEL3...
>
> pgsql-announce :)
>
>
> Seriously. People upgrade when they feel like it, how many times do we see:
>
> "I am running 8.1.4..., I know, I know, can you just help with this?".
>
> I think we are wasting valuable real estate keeping the older releases
> on the front page.
Thats why we put it there - to help tell people they need to upgrade.
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-08-10 18:05:45 | Re: [DOCS] Version differences |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-10 14:18:21 | Re: Version differences |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-08-10 14:26:28 | Re: Features list |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-08-10 14:18:21 | Re: Version differences |