Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: How much ram is too much

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: david(at)lang(dot)hm
Cc: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, postgresql performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How much ram is too much
Date: 2007-06-08 17:38:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
david(at)lang(dot)hm wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>>  Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other 
>>> systems
>>>  in the server bottleneck ?
> the only way 128G of ram would be too much is if your total database 
> size (including indexes) is smaller then this.
> now it may not gain you as much of an advantage going from 64G to 128G 
> as it does going from 32G to 64G, but that depends on many variables as 
> others have been asking.

I don't know about the IBM but I know some of the HPs require slower ram 
to actually get to 128G.

Joshua D. Drake

> David Lang
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


       === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Zoltan BoszormenyiDate: 2007-06-08 17:38:42
Subject: [OT] Re: How much ram is too much
Previous:From: Bill MoranDate: 2007-06-08 17:37:18
Subject: Re: Please help me understand these numbers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group