Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?
Date: 2007-06-04 13:41:44
Message-ID: 46641698.3070403@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
> should have broken every last man jack of 'em. And yet there's still
> some green to be seen. I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
> test scaffolding.

Yes. The buildfarm script uses the same logic as other tests:

my $ecpg_dir = "$pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg";
my @makeout = `cd $ecpg_dir && $make NO_LOCALE=1 check 2>&1`;
my $status = $? >>8;

The sooner we move to a more unified testing infrastructure the better.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-04 14:31:26 Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-06-04 13:39:17 Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts