| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Avoiding unnecessary reads in recovery |
| Date: | 2007-04-28 10:22:59 |
| Message-ID: | 46332083.6090209@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I was actually thinking that we could slip this in 8.3. It's a simple,
well-understood patch, which fixes a little data integrity quirk as well
as gives a nice recovery speed up.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I assume this is 8.4 material.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>> As regards the zero_damaged_pages question, I raised that some time ago
>>>> but we didn't arrive at an explicit answer. All I would say is we can't
>>>> allow invalid pages in the buffer manager at any time, whatever options
>>>> we have requested, otherwise other code will fail almost immediately.
>>> Yeah --- the proposed new bufmgr routine should probably explicitly zero
>>> the content of the buffer. It doesn't really matter in the context of
>>> WAL recovery, since there can't be any concurrent access to the buffer,
>>> but it'd make it safe to use in non-WAL contexts (I think there are
>>> other places where we know we are going to init the page and so a
>>> physical read is a waste of time).
>> To implement that correctly, I think we'd need to take the content lock
>> to clear the buffer if it's already found in the cache. It doesn't seem
>> right to me for the buffer manager to do that, in the worst case it
>> could lead to deadlocks if that function was ever used while holding
>> another buffer locked.
>>
>> What we could have is the semantics of "Return a buffer, with either
>> correct contents or completely zeroed out". It would act just like
>> ReadBuffer if the buffer was already in memory, and zero out the page
>> otherwise. That's a bit strange semantics to have, but is simple to
>> implement and works for the use-cases we've been talking about.
>>
>> Patch implementing that attached. I named the function "ReadOrZeroBuffer".
>>
>> --
>> Heikki Linnakangas
>> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-04-28 12:44:34 | Re: strange buildfarm failures |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-04-28 10:20:52 | Re: Avoiding unnecessary reads in recovery |