| From: | Cosimo Streppone <cosimo(at)streppone(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | Postgresql Performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What`s wrong with JFS configuration? |
| Date: | 2007-04-26 08:45:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4630669D.7030106@streppone.it |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2007, at 8:51 AM, Paweł Gruszczyński wrote:
>> where u6 stores Fedora Core 6 operating system, and u0 stores 3
>> partitions with ext2, ext3 and jfs filesystem.
>
> Keep in mind that drives have a faster data transfer rate at the
> outer-edge than they do at the inner edge [...]
I've been wondering from time to time if partitions position
can be a (probably modest, of course) performance gain factor.
If I create a partition at the beginning or end of the disk,
is this going to have a determined platter physical position?
I remember having heard that every manufacturer has its own
allocation logic.
Has anyone got some information, just for curiosity?
--
Cosimo
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shohab Abdullah | 2007-04-26 11:19:58 | PostgreSQL Performance Tuning |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-04-26 08:35:24 | Re: seeking advise on char vs text or varchar in search table |