| From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile |
| Date: | 2007-04-25 18:50:37 |
| Message-ID: | 462FA2FD.3030705@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> I don't know about the RPM packaging rules, but you can build from
>> source just fine as long as you don't try to regenerate any of the
>> autoconf/automake stuff.
>
> Not really an option for me, since I need to insert the same libtool
> version that is used on whichever Red Hat distribution I'm building for.
>
> In any case, the other point is that you're failing to distribute the
> complete source code as defined by the LGPL license you're using
> (ie, the "preferred form of the work for making modifications" ---
> derived files ain't it).
>
> Being the authors, you can of course do whatever you want, but it's
> arguably illegal for Red Hat or other packagers to redistribute this
> package, since we are likewise failing to provide the complete source
> code.
That's only an issue if we (as copyright holders) should take action of
course - which would be a pretty stupid thing to do - but I see your
point, and can imagine the nervous ticks your lawyers would probably
develop :-)
Regards, Dav e.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | KJ | 2007-04-26 14:01:24 | Rollback transaction doesn't work |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-25 18:22:19 | Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile |