Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Concurrent connections in psql

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Concurrent connections in psql
Date: 2007-03-27 21:24:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:11 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> I would love, love, love to be able to use this syntax within pg_dump as
>>> well, so we can create multiple indexes in parallel at restore time.
>>> Anyone fancy adding that as well? We should be able to speed up overall
>>> index builds by x2 using concurrent builds.
>> You will need to teach pg_restore any trick you use here - it doesn't 
>> use psql.
> The proposed change is to psql and making it work with pg_restore would
> take a lot more thought, so probably not an 8.3 item. Should we make it
> to neither because we can't make it to both?

I'm all for the change to psql, but personally I think it's late in the 
day to be specifying a change to pg_dump.



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2007-03-27 22:47:19
Subject: Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-03-27 21:13:47
Subject: Re: Concurrent connections in psql

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group