Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Documentation access problems.

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Hugh Sasse <hgs(at)dmu(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation access problems.
Date: 2007-03-23 19:56:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
>>> Lots of projects publish their HTML docs in two formats: One Big HTML 
>>> file with everything; Broken up into many HTML files that link to each 
>>> other.  This would allow you you have one big searchable document.
>> The key word there being "big" ;-) ... I don't have any problem with
>> making such a version available on the website, but I don't think
>> shipping two versions of the HTML docs in our tarballs is reasonable.
> I think having the single HTML file version available on our web site is
> enough.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-03-23 20:56:40
Subject: pgsql: We no longer need to palloc the VacuumStmt node; keeping it on
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-03-23 19:33:56
Subject: Re: Documentation access problems.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group