Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace

From: Gilles Darold <gillesdarold(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
Cc: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace
Date: 2021-03-21 16:46:47
Message-ID: 45fe2893-1efc-1666-3ea5-b5fb1918c7fa@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le 21/03/2021 à 15:53, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net> writes:
>> If this turns out to be a case of "attached the wrong patch, here's
>> the one that does implement foo_regex functions!" then I reserve an
>> objection to that. :)
>>

And the patch renamed.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-regexp-foo-functions.patch text/x-patch 71.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2021-03-21 16:50:46 Fix pg_upgrade to preserve datdba (was: Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects)
Previous Message Gilles Darold 2021-03-21 16:40:45 Re: [PATCH] proposal for regexp_count, regexp_instr, regexp_substr and regexp_replace