From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans |
Date: | 2007-03-02 21:44:30 |
Message-ID: | 45E89ABE.8070008@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:52:14AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Unfortunately we (the community) will not have WITH/RECURSIVE for 8.3.
>> However I have spoken with a Alexey and Alvaro and Command Prompt has
>> decided to make WITH/RECURSIVE a priority for 8.4.
>
> Any chance we can get WITH without RECURSIVE? That would be very
> handy all by itself.
I spoke with Alvaro and he politely but firmly reminded me that we have
an autovac committment to the 8.3 tree that we would prefer to keep.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Cheers,
> D
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-02 21:45:30 | Re: Custom session variables? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-02 21:39:38 | Re: How often do I need to reindex tables? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-02 22:05:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump? |
Previous Message | Darcy Buskermolen | 2007-03-02 21:41:18 | Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 |