Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch license update to developer's FAQ
Date: 2007-03-02 18:29:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have added to the developer's FAQ that we don't want
> non-BSD-compatible licensed patches:
>     <li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license.  By posting a patch
>     to the public PostgreSQL mailling lists, you are giving the PostgreSQL
>     Global Development Group the non-revokable right to distribute your
>     patch under the BSD license.  If you use code that is available under
>     a BSD-compatible license (eg. public domain), please note that in your
>     email submission.  If the license is not BSD-compatible (e.g. GPL),
>     please do not post the patch.</li>

How about something simpler:

<li>PostgreSQL is licensed under a BSD license. Patches that are
submitted another a non-compatible license (such as the GPL) will be


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-03-02 18:35:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-03-02 18:24:43
Subject: Re: Updated propsoal for read-only queries on PITRslaves (SoC 2007)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group