| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors |
| Date: | 2007-02-27 17:23:22 |
| Message-ID: | 45E4690A.7000909@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-students |
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> I agree we certainly don't want to go designing these projects in
> advance, but I think we could at least ensure that the community buys
> into the concept of each project.
Yes, at least for those that go on a suggestion list. And that was my
worry about Warren's suggestion - I haven't seen much enthusiasm for it
from anyone else, so the degree of in-principle buyin is fairly dubious.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-02-27 17:23:30 | Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-02-27 17:21:34 | Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-02-27 18:03:39 | Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-02-27 17:21:34 | Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors |