Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date: 2007-02-27 12:42:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
>> comments.
> The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with 
> Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?".  I don't think "Can I use 
> this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar 
> interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".

You have right that it is not frequent question, but my colleagues have 
bad experience with people who did it with samba server and it is only 
warning "don't do that" for people who want to try it.

If you guess that it is not important, do not hesitate to remove it.


In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-02-27 13:28:48
Subject: Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut
Previous:From: ferdinand.wessDate: 2007-02-27 11:32:57
Subject: BUG #3083: Installation to path with umlaufs fails with initdb

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2007-02-27 13:34:26
Subject: Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 3.2
Previous:From: ITAGAKI TakahiroDate: 2007-02-27 11:51:36
Subject: Re: patch for ECPG (BUG #2956: ECPG does not treat multibyte characters correctly.)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group