Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date: 2007-02-27 12:42:24
Message-ID: 45E42730.1010606@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
>> comments.
>
> The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with
> Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use
> this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar
> interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".
>

You have right that it is not frequent question, but my colleagues have
bad experience with people who did it with samba server and it is only
warning "don't do that" for people who want to try it.

If you guess that it is not important, do not hesitate to remove it.

Zdenek

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2007-02-27 13:28:48 Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut
Previous Message ferdinand.wess 2007-02-27 11:32:57 BUG #3083: Installation to path with umlaufs fails with initdb

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2007-02-27 13:34:26 Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 3.2
Previous Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2007-02-27 11:51:36 Re: patch for ECPG (BUG #2956: ECPG does not treat multibyte characters correctly.)