Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Jav Database Performance

From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Walter Cruz <walter(dot)php(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Jav Database Performance
Date: 2007-02-26 09:35:02
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Walter Cruz wrote:
> Have anyone seen this?

Looks like a good, well documented benchmark. Was well worth the read. 
Probably even more if you're more into Java than I am.

What's surprising me is, that PostgreSQL often was 'only marginally 
slower' compared to MySQL. First, I thought: wow, MySQL must have 
improved. But later on, I've read that they tested the MyISAM storage 
engine. Thus, I'm surprised that

  a) they perform only marginally better, and

  b) that the results are so close and similar.

I can only conclude, that PostgreSQL does a very well job in keeping the 
costs of consistency very low. ;-)



In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Guillaume LelargeDate: 2007-02-26 10:14:07
Subject: Re: successful booth at Fosdem (Brussels)
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-02-26 09:32:11
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL on Windows Paper

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group