Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] BUG #2977: dow doesn't conform to ISO-8601

From: Adriaan van Os <postgres(at)microbizz(dot)nl>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2977: dow doesn't conform to ISO-8601
Date: 2007-02-21 11:06:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Updated version applied.  I reduced the numering changes for the macros.
> There was also documentation text for "dow" and a few others that said
> "(for <type>timestamp</type> values only)", but in fact the field worked
> for "timestamptz" and "date" too, so I removed the mentions.  If people
> get confused, I will come up with new wording, like "doesn't work for
> interval or time", which I think is pretty obvious.  I remember people
> got confused in the past about this, so maybe we still need something.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> I have implemented 'isodow' with the attached patch.

Thanks for the patch and the new function.

Adriaan van Os

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Cedric ScottDate: 2007-02-21 13:18:36
Subject: BUG #3046: odbc zip file corrupt
Previous:From: Thomas FrommDate: 2007-02-21 09:36:47
Subject: Re: BUG #2973: Compile Error with MIPSpro compiler

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Florian G. PflugDate: 2007-02-21 13:37:46
Subject: Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion
Previous:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2007-02-21 11:04:47
Subject: Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group