Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zach Bagnall <zach(dot)bagnall(at)bulletinwireless(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, radhika(at)88thstreet(dot)com
Subject: Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2
Date: 2007-02-14 03:00:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-admin
Tom Lane wrote:
> Zach Bagnall <zach(dot)bagnall(at)bulletinwireless(dot)com> writes:
>>> Seriously though, the PITR recovery mechanism is quite mature and usable.
>> I would say it is a good start - and progress is clearly being made. But 
>> it wont be "usable" for most serious applications until we have 
>> per-database transaction logging and backup recovery.
> Don't hold your breath; that's not even on the agenda, much less
> something that's likely to appear soon.  If you need separable recovery
> then run a different postmaster instance for each database.

I would have to concur... if you need such a feature I would wonder why
you are running multiple databases within the same cluster at all.

Joshua D. Drake

> 			regards, tom lane


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

In response to


pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Zach BagnallDate: 2007-02-14 03:26:24
Subject: Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-02-14 01:12:35
Subject: Re: Postgresql Upgrade 7.4 to 8.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group