Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib
Date: 2007-01-28 21:59:59
Message-ID: 45BD1CDF.5010207@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> I don't mind this term, BUT, what we need to get across is not just that
>> these are extensions, but that they are *standard* extensions, supplied
>> with PostgreSQL core code and supported by the PostgreSQL core team.
>> This would be analogous with, say, the standard perl modules (like
>> Exporter or IO::Handle) that come with the standard perl source
>> distribution. If we can get that idea across then we might lower the
>> resistance of people like hosting providers to loading them.

Furthering the perception is reality rule perhaps the schema should be
called std_ext?

>
> Integrating their docs into the standard PostgreSQL SGML (or XML,
> should we go there) docs would go a long, long way toward helping with
> this.

Agreed.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2007-01-28 22:02:04 Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-01-28 21:58:38 Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib