Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: guid/uuid datatype

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date: 2007-01-25 17:27:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> So.. do we agree for uuid to be included in the core?
> I suggest that you read the discussion in the tsearch thread about 
> figuring out how to make contrib modules more attractive.  I don't see 
> a reason why uuid has to be in the core, but I do see that there needs 
> to be some centrally organized consolidation of the various existing 
> attempts under a label of officiality.

I think it would be more important to determine how we can get UUID in
core. It is a known and accepted way of doing things in the marketplace
and professional communities.

It is time we stop fighting features for the sake of fighting features.


Joshua D. Drake



      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2007-01-25 17:51:14
Subject: Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2007-01-25 17:13:54
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group