Re: NOTICE: word is too long INSERT 0 3014

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: PgSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: NOTICE: word is too long INSERT 0 3014
Date: 2006-10-26 17:32:55
Message-ID: 4540F147.30701@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Any thoughts on the below?

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running into this limitation ALOT with Tsearch2. What are my
> options to get around it. Do I have to compile PostgreSQL with a
> different block size?
>
> If yes, what are the downsides to doing so (outside of not being able to
> do straight upgrades)?
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Jones 2006-10-26 17:46:37 Re: more than 32 parameters to a function?
Previous Message John Sidney-Woollett 2006-10-26 17:16:26 Re: grouping excluding some text results

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Troy 2006-10-26 17:35:21 Re: [DOCS] Replication documentation addition
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-26 17:21:53 Re: Nasty btree deletion bug