Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Date: 2006-10-25 14:13:57
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
>> A big part of the value of Postgresql is the applications and extensions
>> that support it. Hiding the existence of some subset of those just
>> because of the way they're licensed is both underselling postgresql
>> and doing something of a disservice to the user of the document.
> OK, does that mean we mention EnterpriseDB in the section about Oracle
> functions?

Way to compare apples to houses their Bruce. We are talking about
*PostgreSQL* replication solutions. Not *Oracle* compatibility
functions, However, *if* we had an Oracle compatibility section, I would
say, "Yes it does make sense to list EnterpriseDB as a Proprietary
Commercial solution to migrating from Oracle.

>  Why not mention MS SQL if they have a better solution?

Because we aren't talking about MS SQL, we are talking about PostgreSQL.

>  I
> just don't see where that line can clearly be drawn on what to include.
> Do we mention Netiza, which is loosely based on PostgreSQL?   It just
> seems very arbitrary to include commercial software.

It is no more arbitrary than including *any* information on PostgreSQL
replication solutions, because PostgreSQL doesn't have any.

PostgreSQL doesn't do replication, except for PITR (and that is pushing
it as a replication solution).

Now.. there are *projects* that enable PostgreSQL to do replication.
Some of them are Open Source, some of them are commercial products.


Joshua D. Drake


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Markus SchaberDate: 2006-10-25 14:16:14
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-10-25 14:08:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-10-25 14:15:03
Subject: Re: [JDBC] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-10-25 14:08:39
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group