Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER <pelletier_32(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code
Date: 2006-10-25 03:26:07
Message-ID: 453ED94F.8080403@opencloud.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Tom Lane wrote:

> NULL, /* let the backend deduce param type */

I think the JDBC driver will be passing the int4 OID for the param type
in this case.

Best thing is probably for the OP to run with loglevel=2 and see exactly
what's being sent, though.

-O

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-10-25 03:34:03 Re: Incorrect behavior with CE and ORDER BY
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-25 03:08:53 Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message JEAN-PIERRE PELLETIER 2006-10-25 12:53:09 Re: [JDBC] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-25 02:42:17 Re: [HACKERS] server process (PID 1188) exited with exit code -1073741819, 8.2 beta1