Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ?
Date: 2007-08-31 23:43:54
Message-ID: 4533.1188603834@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If he gets it done soon (before the HOT dust settles) I will be strongly
>> tempted to try to sneak it into 8.3 ...

> Could you or Florian suggest how other people might assist in meeting that
> goal? It seems like something worthwhile but it's not clear to me how to
> add manpower to it usefully.

Review the patch? He posted v2 on -hackers just a little bit ago. I
suggested some cosmetic changes but it's certainly ready to read now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Lewis 2007-09-01 00:09:17 Re: Fwd: 8.2 Query 10 times slower than 8.1 (view-heavy)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-31 23:39:25 Re: Fwd: 8.2 Query 10 times slower than 8.1 (view-heavy)